Orpheus at Carnegie Hall: Brahms and Schoenberg

Orpheus launched its new Carnegie Hall season last week with one of the strangest concerts that, in my experience, it has ever offered. The idea, I can see, was chaste enough: Brahms and Schoenberg. Vienna, in other words, Central. (Never forget that Schoenberg not only orchestrated Brahms’s first piano quartet – brilliantly, but with bold strokes that would have caused Brahms to burn the MS of the original in a vain attempt at prophylaxis – but that he also authored an important essay, “Brahms the Progressive,” in which he sniffed out all sorts of “modern” irregularities” in the older composer’s harmonies.) Unfortunately, the works scheduled for the first half of the concert were the wrong Brahms and the wrong Schoenberg. The latter’s Chamber Symphony should not appear anywhere near Brahms (who would undoubtedly burn Schoenberg’s MS as well), and, as for the Hungarian Dances that started thing off, they were Unearned Rewards. I love the Hungarian Dances – who does not – but, as with fine chocolates, I can’t swallow more than three at once at the absolute maximum. At least Orpheus got that right: there were only three dances.

As for the second half, let me just say that Allan Kozinn’s review in the Times, although entitled “One Pianist, One Orchestra, No Conductor,” never touched on what made the performance of Brahms’s First Piano Concerto different from all the ones that we’ve sat through with conductors. I think that a word or two on that subject just might have been order. As you’ll be able to tell from the new page at Portico.

Brahms and Schoenberg, with pianist Yefim Bronfman.

MP3    RSS

2 Responses to “Orpheus at Carnegie Hall: Brahms and Schoenberg”

  1. Fossil Darling says:

    Orpheus is a marvelous orchestra and I certainly would have been interested in going to hear what the Brahms sounded like now that you have described it so well, but I don’t think we’re in the post-conductor age yet, or will ever be.

    I am not sure what form the orchestra of the future will take, but I don’t think that for large scale works such as Requiems, Masses, and some of the bigger symphonic works (Mahler 2/3 with soloists, Beethoven 9th) you would want to attend a conductor-less performance.

    Having said that, and having attended NY Philharmonic concerts for over 45 years, I do wonder how orchestras are going to remain relevant, how they will get people into the halls.

    And I do remember Mr. Law very very well………….

  2. Father Tony says:

    The podcasting voice. Melifluous.